You Don’t Need an Editor Because You’re a Bad Writer...
- Sally Collings
- 4 days ago
- 3 min read

You need an editor because you’re a serious one.
The best writers I know—the sharpest thinkers, the clearest communicators—want strong editorial input. Not because they’re unsure of themselves, but because they know something essential: writing is a collaborative act, and editing is what makes the difference between good and great.
The Invisible Hand That Shapes Great Books
Editing is often misunderstood as line-polishing or typo-catching. But that’s just the surface. The real work of editing happens deeper down, where the structure, logic, and voice of a book are being fine-tuned. An editor will:
Stress-test your structure—Does the book hold up chapter by chapter, from start to finish? Is the logic clear and cohesive?
Sharpen your voice—Is the tone consistent and compelling? Are you saying what you mean, in a way your readers will feel?
Re-align with your audience and goals—Are you writing for yourself… or for the people who will actually buy and read this book?
If you’re writing a business book, a memoir, a big ideas book—anything that aims to inform or inspire—it’s not just about getting words on a page. It’s about making those words work hard.
High-Profile Writers Get Edited. A Lot.
Here’s the secret no one tells aspiring authors: every successful author has an editor. In fact, often more than one.
Malcolm Gladwell, for example, has spoken often about his reliance on editors to shape his distinctive storytelling style. He has emphasized how editorial feedback challenges him to refine his ideas and storytelling approach. He acknowledges that while his initial drafts may seem solid, it's through the editorial process that his work truly evolves and improves.
Stephen King, one of the most prolific and bestselling authors of our time, is famously disciplined about editing—and equally blunt about its importance. In his “craft memoir,” On Writing, he makes it clear that rewriting and refinement are non-negotiable:
“Only God gets it right the first time and only a slob says, ‘Oh well, let it go, that’s what copyeditors are for.’”
Editing is not a sign of weakness. It’s a sign of professionalism. It’s the move of someone who takes the work—and their readers—seriously.
The Real Red Flag?
It’s not someone who needs a lot of editing.
It’s someone who thinks they don’t.
That’s the moment I start to worry—because it often signals someone who’s more interested in being right than in getting it right.
A good editor isn’t there to change your voice or take over your ideas. They’re there to amplify, elevate, and refine. To help you say the thing you meant to say, only better.
What Kind of Editor Do You Need?
Not all editors do the same thing. Here’s a quick cheat sheet:
Developmental editors help you shape the big-picture concept, flow, and structure.
Line editors focus on voice, tone, and clarity at the sentence level.
Copyeditors handle grammar, syntax, and consistency.
Proofreaders are your last line of defense before printing.
Depending on where you are in the process, you might need one—or all—of the above. The important thing is recognizing that great books are rarely the product of a lone genius. They’re the result of creative, strategic collaboration.
Final Thought
You don’t need an editor because you’re a bad writer.
You need one because you care about your writing.
Because you’re not just trying to publish a book—you’re trying to make it excellent.
And that starts with being open to what editing can do.
Comments